|
Total: (41) Page (3 of 5)
|
 Content and interface improved despite not so good financial news
Written by KC from Hong Kong on 12/30/2000
|
| Although there are bad news about the company itself like layoff, the content has been improved over the past couple of months and the design is more user-friendly.
Also found that access to China content is quick. But linkage to other tom-related sites need improvement. |
 |
Banker as managment...
Written by Paul Green from Hong Kong on 12/28/2000
|
| Anybody notice one common symtoms of TOM.COM, the management teams are composed of bunch of bankers who are skilful in making deals and packaging the companies but never have any solid experience in managing and running a business. Speculator than long term investor, no future at all for this ICP.
|
|
Poor TOM
Written by R. Li from Hong Kong on 12/20/2000
|
| Two of the ING Baring's analyst have brought the target price of TOM.COM from HK$7 to HK$1 and that's really powerful inflence on the market yesterday, which bring down TOM by almost 10%. In the case of Asia's Internet companies, analysts are hell to dot-coms, constantly harping on the demise of the Internet and driving down valuations further. |
|
What's the real value?
Written by Jeremy Dean from China on 11/27/2000
|
| I tested "TOM Voice", so called ", the first voice portal in Mainland China, combines voice differentiation and transformation to allow users voice activated access to the Internet, but tell me the truth, what's the real value it added to the existing portal while the content isn't good and deep enough? Or this is just another method to boost up the stock price. |
|
The Fench Star acquisition...
Written by Warburg Nicolson from Hong Kong on 10/16/2000
|
| The Fench Star acquisition is the latest in a round of investments made by Tom.com. Indeed, the Fench Star acquisition allows Tom.com to tap into a real-business market. I wonder how the firm will keep on track to its goal of becoming profitable by 2003, especially for a company whose business is still mainly focused on content. |
|
Spending $$$ again for nothing.
Written by Petty Ho from China on 9/6/2000
|
| Tom.com has acquired 100 percent ownership of 163.net from parent firm Freenet Information Technology for HK$374.4 million. I think TOM.COM has made one of the biggest decision and accelerates it's burning rate.
Btw, the content is still pretty empty as well as more Java Sript errors all over the site. |
|
Agree, TOM.COM is much stable now!
Written by Norman Cheng from Hong Kong on 9/4/2000
|
| I realized TOM.COM has shift all their Linux, PHP and mySQL backend to Sun Solaris, JSP + Oracle. This is good, at least TOM.COM won't scare me away at first shot. However, it's still an empty shell.
BTW, Rumor saying it's going to take over 163.net next week. Well, myself as a regional head of a prestigious private investment bank won’t recommend my clients to invest in their stock for long term.
|
|
Hope it is getting better
Written by Could Be More Positive from Hong Kong on 9/4/2000
|
| A recent visit shows that the latest homepage is more "portal-like". But I must say that, letting alone the JS errors, the original one looks more exciting (if you have broadband access). Highlights will change as one clicks on different channels. This is something quite different from the other (even more) "me-too" portal. |
|
More disappointment!
Written by Allan Ubinley from Hong Kong on 9/1/2000
|
| I am totally disappointed in TOM.COM and its subsidiaries including GoChinaGo.com and AAStock.com.
Really, I was disappointed first time in March seeing a green monster with virtual nothing inside. Then after 4 months waiting with the launched of TOM.COM 2, I see an even greener monster with more Java Script and incompatible browser problem. Now we see TOM.COM and its subsidiaries laid off staffs and I vision TOM.COM will bankrupt within this year !!!
|
|
Doesn't make sense!
Written by Mary from Hong Kong on 8/13/2000
|
| If you think tom is bad, look at their investments. oneasia is trash, gochinago is worse than trash, the shanghainese vod for hk$200m? and aastock with the ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, com'on just give me a break. the only investment that seems to make some sense is she.com. At least the name is worth it. |
|
|
|
- Update Within 7 Days
- Update Within 14 Days
- Update Within 21 Days
- Newly Added Site
- Recommend Site
- Our Sponsors